Rice Rages During Fiery Wallace Interview

16 October, 2006 at 11:06 pm | In Incompetence Exposed | 27 Comments

In a fleeting tribute to the American free press, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice angrily came out with arms flailing at Chris Wallace in an interview on Fox News Sunday.

Rice labelled the journalist a “godless sodomite” and “tratorous terrorist enabler”, as the journalist asked her the tough questions about U.S.S. Cole and the Bush administration’s failure to find Bin Laden in it’s first 8 months in office.

Rice stormed off halfway through the interview, after verbally assaulting Wallace, and refused to continue.

“She completely lost it! I asked her genuine questions and she replied with undeserved acrimony”, said Wallace in his commentary about the interview, which will be screened in its entirety on Fox tonight.

Rightyo then…

Stay tuned for updates

Technorati Tags: SATIRE, Chris Wallace, Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State, Fox, America, media

27 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

That’s awesome, I hope I can catch the interview tonight! Maybe it will find its way to the torrent world.

NG

Comment by N. Gifford — 16 October, 2006 #
Interesting! Looking forward to updates…

Comment by Fahad — 17 October, 2006 #
Just to be sure, you do all realise this is satire?

Comment by junaman — 17 October, 2006 #
again, cancer

Comment by Bill — 17 October, 2006 #
What exactly is your point dear Bill?

Comment by junaman — 17 October, 2006 #
What would have happend if they had asked her about the EPA press release that was edited by the whitehouse and that Rice gave approval of?

How can you label a news reporter a terrorist when you yourself send innocent NY’ers into a dangerous area and give them all long cancer….

Comment by Whitty — 18 October, 2006 #
Watch the Daily Show for more info on this story :p

Comment by Mal — 18 October, 2006 #
i believe rice has a hubris problem like her boss.

Comment by psavic22 — 18 October, 2006 #
LMAO…sorry but I have this strong urge to laugh…so ridiculous beyond words…

Comment by lightcontrast — 18 October, 2006 #
Guess this just goes to show that Republicans can get just as exasperated as the Dems.

It’s nice to see that a reporter can be unbiased and ask the tough questions on both sides of the aisle.

Comment by blucollar10940 — 18 October, 2006 #
Hey, I guess I was wrong!

Didn’t know that this was a satire piece. Oh well……one can dream thou……

Comment by blucollar10940 — 18 October, 2006 #
O buddy, don’t worry. Rice is not familiar with free….

Comment by cars — 18 October, 2006 #
hahahah. lovely. but not on fox. pbs anyone?

Comment by Dmitri — 18 October, 2006 #
That was great. Interesting to read to this.

Comment by MechTech — 18 October, 2006 #
Is it a satire piece? I was only laughing because I thought it was funny, Rice acted like an immature, upset teenager.

Comment by lightcontrast — 18 October, 2006 #
As a UK resident I find this very entertaining; if a UK politician called someone a godless sodomite they’d be thrown to the media wolves and wouldn’t last in office more than a day – A godless sodomite is a non-christian gay person right? it’s also illegal in the UK, against the human rights act of whatever recent year, and lot’s of EU laws, so if it’s broadcast in the UK she’s committed a crime and I can arrest her, at last, real fucking justice…

Comment by nmgarnett — 19 October, 2006 #
Hmm… looks like there are more degrees of “Incompetence” than originally thought, eh Junaman?

Comment by albert — 19 October, 2006 #
If you’re talking about how no one got this, then yes, there are…
Especially when this had SATIRE plastered all over it…

If they can’t understand this, then no wonder they all buy into what fox feeds them…

Comment by junaman — 19 October, 2006 #
HAHHAHAHHAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! That was funny…Chris Wallass asking tough questions??? That’s rich…

Comment by Pink Slip — 20 October, 2006 #
Actually, Junaman, you’re catering to the antiBush crowd here. It goes both ways.

(and you didn’t quite have it “plastered” all over the post, either)

Comment by albert — 20 October, 2006 #
Junaman i didnt get it either…
Then i read down the bottom in your “Technorati Tags” where it says in CAPITALS “satire”
then i remembered that Americans obviously arent a very observant bunch!

Comment by shrinkley — 20 October, 2006 #
Lol…I didn’t check the tags.

Comment by lightcontrast — 20 October, 2006 #
[...] To an extent, yes – there is clear evidence of manipulative intent, whether it be ranging from the outset of Christianity to the church of the Weimar era, but doesn’t that speak as much about the nature of the people (for a contemporary example, take a look here) as much as those doing the manipulation? (This is why democracy is fundamentally flawed and love is the ultimate law). …and arrange the premature death of any who are free of it. [...]

Pingback by Cy thread - on dogmaticism, religious indoctrination, and politicized religion « Fundamentalist Christianity — 24 October, 2006 #
[...] It’s fine, I suppose. But the longer it takes, the more disingenuous your pursuit of “exposing incompetence”, as it were, will look (recent post(s) nonwithstanding). First of all, not all religious people claim they have “seen” or “experienced” god, [...]

Pingback by Junaman thread - Empiricism vs. Rationalism - Pt 4 « Fundamentalist Christianity — 26 October, 2006 #
U’ve got good pics, the site could use a tiny bit of work (no offense) its still awesome

Comment by get quote — 24 January, 2007 #
Just stopped by to visit and got the crunch on your stuff in here – bravo!

Comment by roulette free — 8 June, 2007 #
It´s a very good website you have here,

Comment by group medical insurance — 20 May, 2009 #